The Difference between Person Centred and Psychodynamic therapy

Person-centred and psychodynamic counsels pee-pee a crapper to sally for each one others.. however when the differences betwixt the adventes atomic number 18 examined there atomic number 18 important beas of contradiction and incompatibility Wheeler and McLeod (1995) briefly equation the see principles of Person Centred and Psychodynamic glide path and critically evaluate where the accesses part company with ace anotherPerson centred and psychodynamic counselings, both begin one main calculate -to jock throng develop in a positive counsel and to apparent move manpowert forrad , however the methods they use to surpass this remainder varies . I will give a brief description of both of the mention concepts and compare them ,then evaluate how these differences make the deuce preludees recess . The Psychodynamic Approach focuses on our school principal soul and spirit and how our past posterior influence these aspects especially our childhood experiences and overt childhood dates burn function to perplexity and problems when older.Psychodynamic is actually much about spirit into our unconscious it also delves into how people shit themselves as to our intentions desires and beliefs and how these deceptions evict cause conflict between our expressed goals and our actions. Important aspects of Freudian theory has been the idea that these traumatic experiences are actively repressed and therefore knobs are similarly to repeat patterns of behaviours . he key concepts address psychosexual stages that occur in the childhood stages of development , the id, egotism, super ego and ego defences mechanisms, Freud intendd all of these unconscious purpose processes lead to a souls limn behaviour. Psychodynamic counsellors goal is to make the client aware of there unconscious and dive into there early childhood conflicts . Interpreting transference is practically used to link these past conflicts to the demo problems, dream abst ract may be used to achieve this, free connecter and possibly transference is used to extend past conflictsThe Person Centred Approach is much(prenominal) directed as spirit at a soulfulness as a whole and fashions at people with a positive approach and deliberates with the compensate apt(p) conditions everyone should be able to grow and legislate there full potential and limiting surface though the past is taken into devotion it is not the main theme like psychodynamic , the main matter now is the present and the relationship between the client and the counsellor and commission skills are vital in order to make the client get like they can express themselves Dave Mearns acknowledge the important skills as be congruousness ,empathy and unconditional positive regard. The key concepts involves learning a persons present and dish uping them move onwards to do this counsellors essential look at aspects such as the actualising tendency(growth and development) and the sise therapeutic conditions (the conditions needed to embrace throw).The aims of a person centred counsellor is to provide the right environment for a client and offer a place where the client can feel free to explore themselves and the aspects of change that need to occur a counsellor must view certain qualities to advertize these changes, they must be genuine and see UPR and practically try to achieve change by probing and formal analysis this involved a lot of questions and can be time consuming, especially if a client does not want to open up.We can see where these approaches part with each other, the two approaches both have divers(prenominal) exemplars of looking at privateity and have different therapeutic aims and different techniques to reach these aims. Whereas the person centred approach focuss on experiencing and expressing feelings the psychodynamic approach aims to look at the underlying fear female genitalia these feelings and the unconscious thought b ehind them. n a person centred approach this may result in congruence (directly addressing a situation ) which entails genuineness and personal disclosure in order for the client to feel self aware and would succor with self acceptance and possible help the client with some aspects of there questions . owever counter-transference would be used in psychodynamic nidus ( expressing ones proclaim unconscious feelings onto the therapist) and use this as psychodynamic counsellors believe a client may be using defence mechanisms, therefore must look into their unconscious and may not al slipway answer questions . this may lead to different reactions in the client a client may feel that the psychodynamic approach of counter transference my be distant as psychodynamic counsellors try to be more professional however in person centred the client may feel more invited to open up .Another gather in difference in the two is the way that gender is addressed , psychodynamic counsellors see me n and women as psychologically different collectible the theory of the Oedipus complex yet person centred does not emphasised gender ,therefore psychodynamic approach has been criticised for being phallo-centric . The same applies when cultural differences is looked at however this time it is the psychodynamic approach that does not address culture only when the person centred approach that adapts its skills to suite peoples backgrounds .When I look at these two approaches its clear that they separate because boilers suit psychodynamic pleader is about flesh out elaboration and looks towards the past and what did exist and what conflicts have not been resolved and believes that people are very self destructive ,all in all psychodynamic approach is a very un positive look on people as a whole and it is often criticized for putting to much emphasis on the past and the stages of development Freud often gets criticized for being old fashioned in similitude to the person centred ap proach however psychodynamic counselling did offer a lot of newfound ideas into counselling and still remains very influential.In conclusion I conjecture that there are benefits to both of the counselling approaches and combined persons centred and psychodynamic approaches and together would be a good way to approach counselling however this is debated over widely and not always considered plausible but I think it depends on the therapists individual skills and the model of therapy they use with a client . boilers suit I think that both approaches aim to help the client excel but have very different ways of approaching this and in terms of focusing on a individuals recovery and their overall well being I believe the person centred approach succeeds.